258
General (see his note on Ranell's letter) that there is no necessity for providing for a direct appeal either in addition to, or in substitution for, the right to apply for a writ of habeas corpus; I consider that the Chinese extradition proceeding from Mary Kang to China, as they are in proceedings under the Extradition Act 1870.
As regards extradition for all offences, I think it reasonable to depart from the decision laid down in Lord Carnarvon's Despatch No 26 of the 3rd March 1876, that authenticated depositions taken on oath in China should be admitted in evidence.
The Schedule of crimes should not include crimes under...
| Column1 | Column2 |
|---|---|
is not present, so the text is reflowed as is.
Page numbering is preserved as-is: 258
No table is present in the given text, so no Markdown table syntax is used.
DRAFT.
258
General (see his note
art
par.
6 geht Runell's
letter) that there
is no re
-necessity for
providing for
the
a.
airect
apeal from
either in addition.
ti
or in substitution
Foter
as
the right to an
apply for
swort of
a
habeas corpus ;
5 I consider.
se that the Chinese
#
proceeding. It
extradition from
Mary Kang
to China,
as they are in pro-
Extradition Act 1870.
-ceedings
under the
64.A
regards
Extra
-dition
Sall
offences,
sufficient
reazarr
to depart from the
decision laid down
in Lord Carnarvons
Sort may reasonably
expect that authenticated
}
depositions
aath
taken in China should
be admitted in evidence
in
Despatch No 26.
o the
Jellarch 1876. that
The Schedule
Cuines
o
should not include
crimes under
D
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.